Review



cellmask green labeled pbs  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher cellmask green labeled pbs
    ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. <t>CellMask</t> <t>Green–labeled</t> EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].
    Cellmask Green Labeled Pbs, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 88582 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask green labeled pbs/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 88582 article reviews
    cellmask green labeled pbs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "LIMCH1-enriched extracellular vesicles promote vascular permeability in early-onset preeclampsia"

    Article Title: LIMCH1-enriched extracellular vesicles promote vascular permeability in early-onset preeclampsia

    Journal: Science Advances

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeb8806

    ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. CellMask Green–labeled EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. CellMask Green–labeled EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Confocal Microscopy, Membrane, Staining, In Vitro, Permeability, Cell Culture, Fluorescence

    ( A ) Schematic representative protocol of the Evans blue permeability assay in vivo. ICR mice were administered 100 μl PBS containing 10 μg of Control-EVs ( n = 6) or LIMCH1-EVs ( n = 6) retro-orbitally. Twenty-four hours later, 100 μl of 2% Evans blue dye was injected retro-orbitally. Lung and brain tissues were collected 1 hour after injection of Evans blue dye. ( B ) Images of the mice. White arrow shows a mouse several minutes after Evans blue injection. ( C ) Representative image of the lungs collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right: pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. ( D ) Representative image of the brain collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right, pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. ( E ) Representative images using confocal microscopy. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and ICR mice were administered CellMask Green–labeled PBS ( n = 1) or CellMask Green–labeled 10 μg of JAR EVs ( n = 3). Nuclei were counterstained blue with DAPI. White arrows indicate cells with abundant EV uptake. Scale bar, 10 μm. The images shown here represent magnified regions of the corresponding images presented in fig. S9A. Bottom right graph shows a quantitative result of NIS-Elements AR Analysis program. Data are shown as means ± SD. ** P < 0.01, Student’s t test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic representative protocol of the Evans blue permeability assay in vivo. ICR mice were administered 100 μl PBS containing 10 μg of Control-EVs ( n = 6) or LIMCH1-EVs ( n = 6) retro-orbitally. Twenty-four hours later, 100 μl of 2% Evans blue dye was injected retro-orbitally. Lung and brain tissues were collected 1 hour after injection of Evans blue dye. ( B ) Images of the mice. White arrow shows a mouse several minutes after Evans blue injection. ( C ) Representative image of the lungs collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right: pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. ( D ) Representative image of the brain collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right, pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. ( E ) Representative images using confocal microscopy. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and ICR mice were administered CellMask Green–labeled PBS ( n = 1) or CellMask Green–labeled 10 μg of JAR EVs ( n = 3). Nuclei were counterstained blue with DAPI. White arrows indicate cells with abundant EV uptake. Scale bar, 10 μm. The images shown here represent magnified regions of the corresponding images presented in fig. S9A. Bottom right graph shows a quantitative result of NIS-Elements AR Analysis program. Data are shown as means ± SD. ** P < 0.01, Student’s t test.

    Techniques Used: Permeability, In Vivo, Control, Injection, Confocal Microscopy, Labeling



    Similar Products

    99
    Thermo Fisher cellmask green labeled pbs
    ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. <t>CellMask</t> <t>Green–labeled</t> EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].
    Cellmask Green Labeled Pbs, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask green labeled pbs/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cellmask green labeled pbs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher cellmask deep red plasma membrane stain
    ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. <t>CellMask</t> <t>Green–labeled</t> EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].
    Cellmask Deep Red Plasma Membrane Stain, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask deep red plasma membrane stain/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cellmask deep red plasma membrane stain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher cellmask deep red
    a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with <t>CellMask</t> <t>Deep</t> Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.
    Cellmask Deep Red, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask deep red/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cellmask deep red - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher cellmask tm deep red plasma membrane stain
    a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with <t>CellMask</t> <t>Deep</t> Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.
    Cellmask Tm Deep Red Plasma Membrane Stain, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask tm deep red plasma membrane stain/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cellmask tm deep red plasma membrane stain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher cellmask green plasma membrane stain 255
    a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with <t>CellMask</t> <t>Deep</t> Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.
    Cellmask Green Plasma Membrane Stain 255, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cellmask green plasma membrane stain 255/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cellmask green plasma membrane stain 255 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Fisher Scientific hcs cellmask red 588/612
    a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with <t>CellMask</t> <t>Deep</t> Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.
    Hcs Cellmask Red 588/612, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hcs cellmask red 588/612/product/Fisher Scientific
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hcs cellmask red 588/612 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. CellMask Green–labeled EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: LIMCH1-enriched extracellular vesicles promote vascular permeability in early-onset preeclampsia

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeb8806

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Generation of LIMCH1-OE JAR cells. LIMCH1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase ( GAPDH ) as an internal control. *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( B ) Immunoblot analysis of LIMCH1 and β-actin in control, LIMCH1-OE JAR cells, and their derived EVs. ( C ) Cell viability of JAR-control and JAR-LIMCH1-OE cells. Data are shown as means ± SD. ( D ) Size distribution of JAR-derived sEVs using NTA. ( E ) Morphology of JAR-sEV detected using TEM. Scale bar, 200 nm. ( F ) Immunoblot analysis of tetraspanin markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) in JAR cell lysates and sEVs. ( G ) Schematic representation of the experimental protocol for EV uptake into HUVECs. CellMask Green–labeled EVs were added to HUVECs and observed after 5 h (hours). ( H ) Representative confocal microscopy images. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and cell membrane and nuclei were stained with CellMask Deep Red (red) and Hoechst (blue), respectively. Scale bar, 10 μm. Right graph shows quantitative analysis using NIS-Elements AR. Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. Biological n = 3 per condition. Images represent cropped regions of fig. S5. ( I and J ) In vitro permeability assay using 40-kDa (I) and 70-kDa (J) FITC-dextran. HUVECs cultured on transwell inserts were treated with 6 μg of Control-EVs or LIMCH1-EVs. FITC-dextran was added after 24 hours, fluorescence in the lower chamber was measured as the optical density (OD), and OD after 4 hours was compared. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, Student’s t test. ( K ) TEER measurements. Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments [(I) to (K)].

    Article Snippet: To generate CellMask green-labeled PBS, 1 μl of CellMask Green plasma membrane stain (Invitrogen) was added to 200 μl of PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37°C and transferred to a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube.

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Labeling, Confocal Microscopy, Membrane, Staining, In Vitro, Permeability, Cell Culture, Fluorescence

    ( A ) Schematic representative protocol of the Evans blue permeability assay in vivo. ICR mice were administered 100 μl PBS containing 10 μg of Control-EVs ( n = 6) or LIMCH1-EVs ( n = 6) retro-orbitally. Twenty-four hours later, 100 μl of 2% Evans blue dye was injected retro-orbitally. Lung and brain tissues were collected 1 hour after injection of Evans blue dye. ( B ) Images of the mice. White arrow shows a mouse several minutes after Evans blue injection. ( C ) Representative image of the lungs collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right: pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. ( D ) Representative image of the brain collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right, pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. ( E ) Representative images using confocal microscopy. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and ICR mice were administered CellMask Green–labeled PBS ( n = 1) or CellMask Green–labeled 10 μg of JAR EVs ( n = 3). Nuclei were counterstained blue with DAPI. White arrows indicate cells with abundant EV uptake. Scale bar, 10 μm. The images shown here represent magnified regions of the corresponding images presented in fig. S9A. Bottom right graph shows a quantitative result of NIS-Elements AR Analysis program. Data are shown as means ± SD. ** P < 0.01, Student’s t test.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: LIMCH1-enriched extracellular vesicles promote vascular permeability in early-onset preeclampsia

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeb8806

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic representative protocol of the Evans blue permeability assay in vivo. ICR mice were administered 100 μl PBS containing 10 μg of Control-EVs ( n = 6) or LIMCH1-EVs ( n = 6) retro-orbitally. Twenty-four hours later, 100 μl of 2% Evans blue dye was injected retro-orbitally. Lung and brain tissues were collected 1 hour after injection of Evans blue dye. ( B ) Images of the mice. White arrow shows a mouse several minutes after Evans blue injection. ( C ) Representative image of the lungs collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right: pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. * P < 0.05, Student’s t test. ( D ) Representative image of the brain collected from Control-EV–injected and LIMCH1-EV–injected mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. Graphs showing the quantitative results of Evans blue permeability assay (left, nonpregnant mice; right, pregnant mice). Data are shown as means ± SD. ns, no significance; Student’s t test. ( E ) Representative images using confocal microscopy. EVs were labeled with CellMask Green, and ICR mice were administered CellMask Green–labeled PBS ( n = 1) or CellMask Green–labeled 10 μg of JAR EVs ( n = 3). Nuclei were counterstained blue with DAPI. White arrows indicate cells with abundant EV uptake. Scale bar, 10 μm. The images shown here represent magnified regions of the corresponding images presented in fig. S9A. Bottom right graph shows a quantitative result of NIS-Elements AR Analysis program. Data are shown as means ± SD. ** P < 0.01, Student’s t test.

    Article Snippet: To generate CellMask green-labeled PBS, 1 μl of CellMask Green plasma membrane stain (Invitrogen) was added to 200 μl of PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37°C and transferred to a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube.

    Techniques: Permeability, In Vivo, Control, Injection, Confocal Microscopy, Labeling

    a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with CellMask Deep Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Fabrication of cytotoxic mirror image nanopores

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-64025-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay 24 h post-treatment with 10 µM, 20 µM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide. Data represents mean ± SEM from n = 4 (0 µM, 10 µM and 20 µM) and n = 3 (25 µM). Each dot represents a biological replicate, where each replicate was an independently seeded and treated culture of MDA-MB-231 cells on different days with different passage numbers. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing each treatment to the untreated control (0 µM); Adjusted p values correspond to *p = 0.0206 (10 µM), ***p = 0.0006 (20 µM), ****p < 0.0001 (25 µM) vs. 0 µM. b Immunofluorescence staining with CellMask Deep Red was used to evaluate the integrity of the cell membrane in Control, 0.00125% DDM and 25 µM DpPorA DE-treated cells. Cells were categorized into two phenotypes based on membrane integrity: Intact and Disrupted. Control cells displayed a mixture of phenotypes with a distribution of 67.38 % Intact and 32.62 % Disrupted. c DpPorA DE-treated cells showed a significant increase in the Disrupted phenotype, with 99.3% of cells being Disrupted, indicating a substantial impact of the DpPorA DE peptide on cell membrane integrity . d Fluorescence microscopy images showing different cell membrane integrity phenotypes in Control, 0.00125% DDM, and 25 µM DpPorA DE peptide-treated cells. The two different phenotypes are represented as a hashtag for Intact and the arrow indicates Disrupted cells (100 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). e Representative fluorescence images showing the distribution of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE (green) in MDA-MB-231 cells at 4 h and 24 h post-addition of peptide. Cell membranes were stained with CellMask (red) (50 cells per group, scale bar 20 μm, magnification 63×). f Single-cell fluorescence intensity scatter plot showing increased incorporation of 5-FAM-DpPorA DE at 24 h compared to 4 h, indicating time-dependent peptide incorporation in the cell population.

    Article Snippet: After 24 h of treatment, cells were stained with CellMask Deep Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C10046 ; 1:4000 dilution in PBS) for 5 min at 37 °C.

    Techniques: MTT Assay, Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Membrane, Fluorescence, Microscopy